Pregame comparison unavailable
Game detailsSaturday Index
Loading team intelligenceBringing the latest verified football information into focus.
Saturday Index
Loading team intelligenceBringing the latest verified football information into focus.

American Athletic · 2026 · Week 8

Photo: Michael Barera · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Cropped for display
Up next · Week 9
Home
Hosting
Thursday, October 29 · 7:30 PM EDT
The season, taking shape
Final scores show North Texas first. Oldest to newest.
Pregame comparison unavailable
Game details
at TulsaPregame 32–25
Game details
vs. CharlottePregame 41–17
Game detailsOriginal full-season forecast
This forecast retains the original probabilities for the full schedule. It does not update with completed results or this week’s forecast.
2026 results
Current record, team efficiency, player production, and verified results from completed games.
Current record
5-25 wins · 2 lossesThrough 7 completed gamesLoading player usage…
Original season forecast
The original American Athletic forecast, retained alongside current results.
American Athletic projected standing
#2
6-2 projected · 5.7 expected conference wins · #2 of 14.
Preseason baseline
2025 percentiles retained as preseason context; current results and player production lead this page.
2025 FBS percentile scale · 50 is average
Incoming class
National and conference recruiting ranks, confirmed commitments, and the highest-ranked recruits in this class.
Top committed recruits
North Texas2026 transfer movement
Incoming and outgoing transfer activity, with rated FBS-to-FBS moves below.
Incoming Transfers
North TexasOutgoing Transfers
North TexasSeason schedule
Completed games show final results. Upcoming games use this week’s forecast where available; later games retain their published season outlook.
Detailed football intelligence
The full team identity, offense, defense, and supporting evidence.
Team identity
Last season, North Texas tried to stay balanced between the run and pass; the approach consistently kept the offense on schedule.
Why it matters
Neither offensive unit clearly carried the other, so first-down execution decides whether North Texas can stay on plan.
at NavyPregame 31–26
Game detailsPregame comparisons use preserved published forecasts. Results include wins and losses.
At a glance
Current form leads the outlook.
2026 rates aggregate verified completed-game box scores. EPA is expected points added per play.
| Player | C/ATT | YDS | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tayven Jackson | 161/222 | 2164 | 18 | 5 |
| Chaston Ditta | 14/19 | 159 | 1 | 0 |
| Chris Jimerson Jr. | 2/3 | 55 | 1 | 0 |
| Player | CAR | YDS | AVG | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jahiem White | 117 | 850 | 7.3 | 11 |
| Brendon Haygood | 40 | 164 | 4.1 | 2 |
| Chris Jimerson Jr. | 15 | 91 | 6.1 | 0 |
| Player | REC | YDS | AVG | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justin Stevenson | 41 | 662 | 16.1 | 7 |
| Corri Milliner | 20 | 325 | 16.3 | 1 |
| Jahiem White | 27 | 250 | 9.3 | 2 |
| Player | TOT | SOLO | TFL | SACK |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zakye Barker | 55 | 15 | 2.5 | 2 |
| CJ Coombes | 52 | 17 | 0 | 0 |
| Brandon Jones | 45 | 20 | 4 | 0 |
Saturday, October 24 · Navy-Marine Corps Memorial Stadium
Saturday, October 10 · DATCU Stadium
Thursday, October 1 · Chapman Stadium
Profile high point
The run game held the profile's highest percentile position.Profile low point
Pressure held the lowest percentile position among the profile's strength measures.





The run game is what North Texas can trust most.
Why it matters
The offense has its best route to favorable third downs and a credible play-action menu; front-seven disruption remains the first counter an opponent should test.
The first place to test North Texas is front-seven disruption, especially on ordinary early downs; the run game has to keep the game on plan.
Why it matters
Opponents can trust normal protection and make the defense win without steady negative plays; rushing structure has to keep that stress from setting the game plan.
North Texas is at its best when it can stay balanced between the run and pass, then keep both the pass and run available because neither part of the offense has to carry the plan alone; an average pace puts more weight on winning ordinary downs.
What matters
North Texas's balanced structure played at a balanced pace. Passing finished top-tier and rushing finished top-tier, without a clear split between them.
Inside the team
Open a section for the football detail and supporting numbers.
The down-to-down question that determines whether the offense can keep both the run and pass available.
Opponents have to win first down before North Texas can keep both answers available.
What matters
Neither the pass nor run separated enough to become the only priority, so first-down execution is the real target.
The pace, play selection, and methods this offense uses to stay on schedule.
North Texas played at a balanced pace in 2025.
Why it matters
At that pace, North Texas cannot count on extra possessions or expect to shorten the game.
North Texas's prior passing record was top-tier.
Why it matters
A repeatable pass game can let North Texas punish loaded boxes without relying on low-frequency deep completions.
Why it matters
A sustainable run game keeps North Texas's play action credible and limits obvious passing situations.
North Texas's explosive-play results were mixed rather than a defining edge.
Why it matters
A big play can still flip a possession, but last season's results do not make explosiveness something this team can rely on.
How consistently the offense creates manageable situations and the defense prevents them.
North Texas's offense was more consistent down to down than its defense.
Why it matters
North Texas's success rate shows whether it can sustain drives and get stops without relying on sacks, turnovers, or isolated big plays.
North Texas's opponent-adjusted passing and rushing value were closely matched.
Why it matters
When the split is narrow, early-down execution matters more than steering the offense toward one obvious weakness.
Where the defense can create pressure, control the run, and end drives.
North Texas's prior defense was weak overall and strongest in pass defense.
What matters
Pass defense finished strong, while run front finished bottom-tier; the latter is the first place an offense should test.
North Texas's available disruption measures ranked in the lower national range last season; a charted pressure rate is not available.
North Texas's sack and disruption results were weak.
Why it matters
North Texas's disruption can hurry an offense; sacks do more by erasing field position and ending passing downs.
North Texas's prior run-defense results were bottom-tier.
Why it matters
If North Texas's front cannot control early downs, opponents can keep every offensive option open and protect their passing game.