Week 4 · FinalL
at SMU24–34-10 margin
Pregame 12–47
Game detailsSaturday Index
Loading team intelligenceBringing the latest verified football information into focus.
Saturday Index
Loading team intelligenceBringing the latest verified football information into focus.
Conference USA · 2026 · Week 8
Photo: TDH2015 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Cropped for display
Up next · Week 9
Home
Hosting
Tuesday, October 27 · Time TBA
The season, taking shape
Final scores show Missouri State first. Oldest to newest.
at SMUPregame 12–47
Game details
at Western KentuckyPregame 25–31
Game details
vs. Kennesaw StatePregame
Original full-season forecast
This forecast retains the original probabilities for the full schedule. It does not update with completed results or this week’s forecast.
2026 results
Current record, team efficiency, player production, and verified results from completed games.
Current record
2-52 wins · 5 lossesThrough 7 completed gamesLoading player usage…
Original season forecast
The original Conference USA forecast, retained alongside current results.
Conference USA projected standing
#7
3-5 projected · 3.4 expected conference wins · #7 of 10.
Preseason baseline
2025 percentiles retained as preseason context; current results and player production lead this page.
2025 FBS percentile scale · 50 is average
Incoming class
National and conference recruiting ranks, confirmed commitments, and the highest-ranked recruits in this class.
Top committed recruits
Missouri State2026 transfer movement
Incoming and outgoing transfer activity, with rated FBS-to-FBS moves below.
Incoming Transfers
Missouri StateOutgoing Transfers
Missouri StateSeason schedule
Completed games show final results. Upcoming games use this week’s forecast where available; later games retain their published season outlook.
Detailed football intelligence
The full team identity, offense, defense, and supporting evidence.
Team identity
Last season, Missouri State tried to lean on the passing game; too many drives still went off schedule.
Why it matters
The passing game was Missouri State's more dependable way to stay ahead of the chains; opponents have to interrupt that rhythm without giving the run an easy box.
at DelawarePregame 24–31
Game detailsPregame comparisons use preserved published forecasts. Results include wins and losses.
At a glance
Current form leads the outlook.
2026 rates aggregate verified completed-game box scores. EPA is expected points added per play.
| Player | C/ATT | YDS | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Henry Belin IV | 73/108 | 887 | 6 | 4 |
| Skyler Locklear | 71/108 | 788 | 4 | 2 |
| Elijah Leonard | 1/1 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| Player | CAR | YDS | AVG | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ramone Green Jr. | 57 | 246 | 4.3 | 2 |
| Jambres Dubar | 42 | 233 | 5.5 | 2 |
| Connor Lair | 46 | 183 | 4.0 | 3 |
| Player | REC | YDS | AVG | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Isaiah Myers | 38 | 796 | 20.9 | 7 |
| Jmariyae Robinson | 37 | 296 | 8.0 | 0 |
| Mekhi Miller | 13 | 146 | 11.2 | 0 |
| Player | TOT | SOLO | TFL | SACK |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jared Lloyd | 79 | 35 | 4 | 1 |
| J.J. O'Neal | 42 | 26 | 1 | 0 |
| Christian Ford | 41 | 27 | 1 | 0 |
Tuesday, October 20 · Delaware Stadium
Wednesday, October 14 · Plaster Sports Complex
Thursday, October 8 · Houchens Industries-L.T. Smith Stadium
Profile high point
Big-play creation held the profile's highest percentile position.Profile low point
The run game held the lowest percentile position among the profile's strength measures.
Big-play creation is what Missouri State can trust most.
Why it matters
The offense has its best route to changing field position without requiring flawless drive efficiency; rushing structure remains the first counter an opponent should test.
The run game is Missouri State's biggest concern, and opponents can test it immediately.
What matters
Missouri State's rushing structure ranked near the bottom nationally last season.
Missouri State's best path is to use the passing game to stay on schedule and finish drives; an average pace puts more weight on winning ordinary downs.
What matters
Missouri State's pass-first structure played at a balanced pace. The pass game finished above-average, while the run game finished bottom-tier.
Inside the team
Open a section for the football detail and supporting numbers.
The down-to-down question that determines whether the offense can keep both the run and pass available.
Opponents have to break Missouri State's passing rhythm before it owns early downs.
Why it matters
If Missouri State keeps finding routine completions, the defense cannot load the box or turn the rush loose.
The pace, play selection, and methods this offense uses to stay on schedule.
Missouri State played at a balanced pace in 2025.
Why it matters
At that pace, Missouri State cannot count on extra possessions or expect to shorten the game.
Missouri State's prior passing record was above-average.
Why it matters
A repeatable pass game can let Missouri State punish loaded boxes without relying on low-frequency deep completions.
Missouri State's prior rushing record was bottom-tier.
Why it matters
When Missouri State's run game cannot stay on schedule, protection and passing-down execution carry more of the offense.
Missouri State's explosive-play upside came with real defensive volatility.
Why it matters
That mix can produce fast scoring swings in either direction and makes missed tackles or coverage busts especially expensive.
How consistently the offense creates manageable situations and the defense prevents them.
Missouri State's defense was more consistent down to down than its offense.
Why it matters
Missouri State's success rate shows whether it can sustain drives and get stops without relying on sacks, turnovers, or isolated big plays.
Opponent-adjusted EPA identifies the pass game as Missouri State's stronger offensive unit.
Why it matters
If an opponent removes the first passing answer, the run game's lower adjusted value becomes the key counter to test.
Where the defense can create pressure, control the run, and end drives.
Missouri State's prior defense was weak overall and strongest in run front.
Why it matters
Opponents can trust normal protection and make coverage hold through the route; Missouri State needs its run front to create long-yardage without overloading the box before that plan settles in.
Missouri State's available disruption measures ranked in the lower national range last season; a charted pressure rate is not available.
Missouri State's sack and disruption results were weak.
Why it matters
Missouri State's disruption can hurry an offense; sacks do more by erasing field position and ending passing downs.
Missouri State's prior run-defense results were middle-of-the-pack.
Why it matters
If Missouri State's front cannot control early downs, opponents can keep every offensive option open and protect their passing game.
