Features · Alabama
Alabama’s defense looks ready for the playoff. The offense has three weeks to catch up.
The Crimson Tide return a potentially elite secondary and two dangerous receivers. Their season depends on whether an open quarterback race and a rebuilt offensive line can become dependable before the schedule accelerates.
Alabama’s 2025 season ended with the sort of score that follows a program into the offseason. Indiana beat the Crimson Tide 38–3 in the Rose Bowl, held them to 193 yards and turned a College Football Playoff quarterfinal into a four-quarter inventory of everything Alabama could not solve.
That ending should not erase what came before it. Kalen DeBoer’s second Alabama team finished 11–4, went 7–1 in SEC play, reached the conference championship game and won a playoff game at Oklahoma after falling behind 17–0. The Tide were resilient enough to rescue their season more than once. They were also inconsistent enough to lose four games, rush for only 23 yards against Indiana and finish January with no illusion about how much work remained.
The response has been more renovation than reset. Alabama extended DeBoer through the 2032 season. Ryan Grubb is back to run the offense, Kane Wommack remains in charge of the defense and Maurice Linguist continues to oversee a secondary that may be the best position group in the country. The staff has continuity even as the roster changes around it.
The most important changes are concentrated on offense. Ty Simpson is gone after throwing for 3,567 yards and 28 touchdowns. Four starters must be replaced on the offensive line. The leading rusher, top receiver and most productive tight end from last season are gone. A quarterback competition between Austin Mack and Keelon Russell remains open, and the line protecting the winner is being rebuilt around one returning starter.
Alabama has enough defensive experience and perimeter talent to return to the playoff. The challenge for 2026 is giving those strengths an offense that does not need half a season to discover itself.
Mack or Russell is a decision about more than the quarterback
Mack and Russell have been evaluated against each other for months because they offer different versions of the same offense.
Mack is the taller, more experienced option. He spent his first college season with DeBoer and Grubb at Washington before following them to Tuscaloosa, so much of the language and intent of the system is familiar. His best throws show why the staff has continued to invest in him: he can drive the ball outside the numbers, layer it downfield and make the field feel wider when his feet and timing are right.
Russell changes the geometry. He can escape pressure, extend a play and make a defense account for the quarterback as a runner. That mobility is particularly relevant behind a developing line. Russell also produced the stronger public spring statement, unofficially throwing four touchdown passes during A-Day while Mack was limited late in the scrimmage.
Neither résumé is large enough to settle the argument. Mack completed 24 of 32 passes for 228 yards and two touchdowns in reserve duty last season, including 103 yards after Simpson left the Indiana game. Russell completed 11 of 15 passes for 143 yards and two touchdowns in two appearances. Those are encouraging samples, not proof that either can manage a full SEC schedule.
DeBoer described the race as open before camp, and Grubb’s decision should reflect more than which quarterback makes the prettiest throws in a controlled period. Alabama needs someone who can identify pressure, protect the football and keep an offense with several new linemen out of the wrong play. The choice also reveals how the staff sees the rest of the unit. If the line and run game can keep the pocket clean, Mack’s downfield arm becomes more attractive. If protection remains uneven, Russell’s ability to create outside structure may become essential.
The worst outcome is not choosing the wrong quarterback. It is carrying uncertainty too long, dividing the first-team work and asking the winner to build command on the fly. East Carolina comes to Bryant-Denny Stadium on September 5. One week later, the Tide are in Lexington for an SEC road game. Florida State arrives the following Saturday. Alabama has time to decide. It does not have much time to settle after the decision.
The offensive line is the season’s hinge
Quarterback will dominate the conversation because it always does. The line may decide whether the answer matters.
Alabama averaged 3.4 yards per rush last season and allowed its running game to become too dependent on circumstance. Indiana provided the harshest final example, holding the Tide to 23 rushing yards while controlling the ball for more than 34 minutes. Simpson had produced a strong season, but too many drives still asked the quarterback to solve long-yardage problems created earlier in the series.
Michael Carroll is the only returning starter up front. The former Freshman All-American gives new line coach Adrian Klemm an anchor, but Alabama cannot build an SEC offense around one dependable blocker. Jackson Lloyd entered camp as the likely left tackle after working there in spring. Racin Delgatty, a Cal Poly transfer, has a natural path to the center job. Will Sanders, William Sanders and Mal Waldrep are part of the interior competition, while the staff added Jayvin James, Ty Haywood, Nick Brooks, Ethan Fields and Kaden Strayhorn to deepen a room that needed both bodies and options.
The transfer volume is not the story by itself. Alabama needs five players who can function together. They must pass off twists, communicate on the road and create movement when the defense knows a run is coming. A talented newcomer who has not learned the calls is not an upgrade. A lineup that changes every week never develops the timing required to become one.
Klemm’s arrival matters because the front has become the recurring constraint on an otherwise gifted roster. Alabama did not bring him in merely to identify starters. He has to build a unit that can let Grubb call the whole offense, keep the new quarterback on schedule and make play action credible.
The first version does not have to look like Alabama’s 2020 line. It does have to be stable by October, when Georgia, Tennessee and Texas A&M arrive on consecutive Saturdays.
The backfield must make defenses respect the handoff again
Jam Miller led Alabama with 504 rushing yards last season, and no returning back reached 300. That says as much about the blocking and game conditions as it does about the runners, but it leaves the 2026 backfield without an established feature player.
Daniel Hill has the size and receiving skill to handle a broad assignment. He caught 28 passes last season and scored six rushing touchdowns, giving Grubb a back who can remain useful when the offense changes the picture before the snap. Kevin Riley offers a different style, while AK Dear flashed acceleration by averaging 7.4 yards on 19 carries. Appalachian State transfer Khalifa Keith brings another physical option. Freshmen EJ Crowell and Trae’Shawn Brown add talent without reducing the need for someone to own the difficult work.
The competition should produce a rotation. It also needs to produce trust. Alabama must identify the back who can protect on third down, the runner who can finish a short-yardage series and the player who can create an explosive gain without requiring perfect blocking. Those jobs may belong to three different people.
A more credible run game would help every uncertain part of the offense. It would reduce the number of obvious passing downs for Mack or Russell, slow the rush against a new line and create room for Grubb’s play-action and movement concepts. Alabama does not need one back to become Derrick Henry. It needs the position to stop feeling optional when the game gets hard.
Coleman-Williams and Brooks can keep the passing game dangerous
The receiver room is changing, but it is not starting over.
Ryan Coleman-Williams returns after catching 49 passes for 689 yards and four touchdowns. His 2025 numbers did not match the national frenzy created by his freshman season, and drops became part of the conversation around him. He remains the player most capable of forcing a defense to tilt coverage before the snap. Alabama needs his third season to be defined by consistent winning routes, not the pressure to recreate a 17-year-old’s highlights.
Lotzeir Brooks is positioned to become the other central target. He caught 32 passes for 441 yards as a freshman and delivered his best game when Alabama’s season was on the line, scoring twice in the playoff comeback at Oklahoma. Brooks can separate quickly, produce after the catch and punish a defense that devotes too much attention to Coleman-Williams.
The third starting job is less settled. NC State transfer Noah Rogers was expected to play a major role before suffering an A-Day injury that DeBoer said would extend into the early season. Rico Scott and Derek Meadows have opportunities, and freshman Cederian Morgan gives the room uncommon size. Tight end is also being reconstructed after Josh Cuevas caught 37 passes for 411 yards and four touchdowns last season. Oklahoma State transfer Josh Ford joins Kaleb Edwards and Marshall Pritchett in a room that needs a dependable blocker and an outlet for a first-year starter.
Coleman-Williams and Brooks give Alabama two real answers. The offense becomes much harder to defend if a third receiver and an every-down tight end emerge before Rogers returns.
The secondary gives Alabama a championship foundation
For all the uncertainty on offense, Alabama should not need to invent its defensive identity.
Bray Hubbard intercepted four passes last season. Zabien Brown intercepted two and returned both for touchdowns, including the 50-yard score that pulled Alabama even during its playoff comeback at Oklahoma. Keon Sabb added another interception, and Dijon Lee Jr. gained valuable work as a freshman. Red Morgan, Zavier Mincey and several talented newcomers give Linguist enough depth to match personnel without removing the veterans who understand Wommack’s system.
Brown and Hubbard were named first-team preseason All-SEC, while Sabb made the third team. The honors matter less than the flexibility behind them. Alabama can play tight coverage outside, disguise the safeties and ask its defensive backs to survive when Wommack sends pressure. If the front creates consistent disruption with four rushers, the secondary can become more than a strength. It can dictate games.
Yhonzae Pierre is the clearest returning threat up front. He finished the Indiana loss with 1.5 sacks and enters the season as a preseason All-SEC selection. The Tide also added edge rusher Desmond Umeozulu and rebuilt the defensive line through transfers Devan Thompkins, Terrance Green, Kedrick Bingley-Jones and Caleb Smith. Inside linebacker Caleb Woodson arrives from Virginia Tech to help replace much of the veteran production that left the middle of the defense.
That front does not need to lead the team in headlines. It must stop the run well enough to keep Brown, Hubbard and Sabb out of constant cleanup duty, then create pressure without requiring Wommack to expose the coverage behind a blitz. Indiana rushed for 215 yards in the quarterfinal. The lesson was not subtle.
DeBoer has support—and a different kind of pressure
Alabama’s decision to extend DeBoer through January 2033 removed any serious question about the university’s commitment. He is 20–8 in two seasons in Tuscaloosa, has taken the Tide to the playoff and owns an 8–4 record against ranked opponents at Alabama. Those are good results in the first two years after Nick Saban.
They have not yet produced the week-to-week authority that Alabama expects.
The 2024 team lost four games and missed the playoff. The 2025 team reached the quarterfinals but also absorbed a 21-point SEC Championship loss to Georgia and a 35-point loss to Indiana. DeBoer has shown that his program can recover within a season. The next step is building one that does not require rescue so often.
Continuity should help. Grubb has spent much of his coaching life with DeBoer and knows what the offense is supposed to become. Wommack and Linguist return with a veteran defensive core. Klemm and receivers coach Derrick Nix are important new voices, but this is not a staff learning one another from scratch.
The challenge for DeBoer is converting that familiarity into a clear football identity. Alabama should be able to defend at a high level. It should have explosive receivers. It needs to prove that it can run the ball when the opponent expects it, protect a new quarterback and remain composed when a road game becomes uncomfortable.
The schedule compresses the evaluation
The opener against East Carolina offers one controlled chance to settle into the season. Kentucky immediately tests whether the line and quarterback can communicate away from home. Florida State supplies a prominent nonconference game before South Carolina visits and Alabama travels to Mississippi State.
Then the season accelerates. Georgia comes to Tuscaloosa on October 10. Alabama goes to Tennessee a week later and hosts Texas A&M after that. The Tide get an open date before traveling to LSU, then go to Vanderbilt before Chattanooga provides a late nonconference break. Auburn closes the regular season at Bryant-Denny Stadium.
There are difficult games throughout the slate, but the three-week run against Georgia, Tennessee and Texas A&M is the fulcrum. By then, the quarterback debate has to be over. The line has to be more than a collection of candidates. The backfield needs defined jobs, and the front seven must be capable of making an opponent one-dimensional.
Alabama has enough talent to survive an imperfect afternoon. It will not survive an imperfect month in the middle of this schedule.
The verdict
Alabama’s preseason case begins with one of the country’s best secondaries, a proven coaching structure and two receivers capable of changing a game. Brown, Hubbard and Sabb give the defense experience at the back. Pierre gives the front a pressure player. Coleman-Williams and Brooks give either quarterback a chance to attack rather than merely manage.
The uncertainty is just as concentrated. Mack and Russell have 50 combined career college pass attempts. Carroll is the only returning offensive-line starter. The leading returning rusher had 284 yards last season. Rogers’ injury reduces the early margin at receiver, and the front seven must replace veteran production while correcting the run-defense failure that ended last season.
Those questions do not make Alabama a rebuilding team. They make Alabama a contender whose strongest unit may have to carry September while the offense becomes whole.
If the line settles, the run game becomes credible and one quarterback takes command, DeBoer has a roster capable of returning to the playoff and advancing further. If those answers arrive slowly, the defense may keep Alabama competitive without making it complete.
The Tide do not need to forget the Rose Bowl. They need to build an offense that prevents the same kind of game from happening again.